Jump to content

twodoorgaz

Settled In
  • Posts

    304
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by twodoorgaz

  1. Hi folks. a bit stumped. Dad has a beautifully maintained 1999 P38A 4.6 Vogue and is just stripping the back axle ready for a diff recon @Hybrid_From_Hell Nige - he's spoken with you and it'll be headed your way. The flanged bolts (actually a screw: M10x26mm) that fasten the hub are being a bugger to remove and will need replaced. No great shakes - he'll just order new ones... Except the part number doesn't seem to be listed anywhere. He's checked the bootleg microcat CD, I've since checked all the places I usually use: lrcat .ru and https://parts.jaguarlandroverclassic.com/parts/index/hierarchy/id/9.55819.56286/brand/land-rover/ and Allbrit and it isn't shown in the diagrams. I've found a diagram that shows it in the Bearmach catalogue, but there's no part number listed. He's also been to the local dealer and their parts team couldn't find it. Through a process of elimination we think its LR050515, which looks right and is the right size but with it being a safety critical part you don't want to take a chance on the size being right but the grade being wrong. So does anyone have any other way of checking? I did have access to the LR system last year but my subscription has expired. Screaming ideal scenario here is that someone can find an image from another source and screenshot it - just to give peace of mind. Just to be clear, these are the twelve flanged bolts (six on each side) that pass through the flanges on the axle casing to hold the stub (I'm not familiar with 38As myself, so I assume there's a stub axle there). He takes care to keep all the parts Genuine, so doesn't want to just buy generic 10.9 flanged screws at this stage. If LR050515 is correct then they're cheap enough. Thank you very much.
  2. Thanks all - some really good tips there, if this was a defender I'd have no issues but I'm just not up to speed on Disco/RRC installations. I'll get the two boxes side by side and will have a weight up. @Snagger - yes, I'll be doing it myself. Having it all stripped back to a bare shell on a jig should make it quite straightforward as its mostly flat panels. I have the kit to blast and prime it at home (once the workshop is built) as well as any welders I might need (mig, tig and spot). Being an ex-Portugal car, while there is just a little isolated rust and its otherwise mostly solid. I think I'm familiar with all the repairers that post online, some are artists and others less so - I was going to reply to one of your older threads when you were deciding who to send it to. Likewise: looking forward to seeing yours come back. And ha ha, yep, I am familiar with the work on the channel you mentioned..... he's certainly very entertaining.
  3. Thanks both. no need for the bellhousing, but thank you. I’ll be bringing in complete unit when I get closer to the mechanical work. good shout, I’ll call them - have a couple of gearboxes headed their way.
  4. Hi all. I’m about to commit to a nut and bolt restoration of a 2-door factory 200TDi Range Rover. It’ll take a couple of years and a lot of money. I often read comments about 200TDi parts availability being limited. I remember Terri-Ann Wakeman writing about this on her site some 15 years ago - specifically citing cylinder heads being NLA and suspect a lot of the commentary started there. I never really understood this: if I wanted a cylinder head I’d buy one second hand and have it refurbished. It wouldn’t enter my head to buy one from Land Rover so being NLA ‘new’ seems like an odd thing to be concerned about. Nonetheless, some parts do seem harder to find than the 300TDi. So it seems prudent to build up a bit of a stock throughout this rebuild. obviously we don’t know exactly what the future will look like in terms of fuel availability, but I’d rather stock up and not need them. so, could anyone suggest those items that, if found cheaply, would be sensible to squirrel away? I’ve already put a crack-tested cylinder head on my list along with a cast exhaust manifold. But what else? I'm planning on keeping the RR for life and am assuming that generic spares and those common to the 300TDi will remain available. I’m looking to gather enough bits to cover me for for day-to-day maintenance as well as one engine rebuild.
  5. Hi everyone. I have a 1993 RRC with a factory 200TDi and it’s factory LT77s and I’m just getting ready to start the full bare shell restoration. I already know the gearbox will need to go to ashcrofts for a rebuild, but I’m really struggling with the idea of spending money on the LT77 design when so many ex-Discovery R380s are around. I’ve never been a big fan of the LT77 and I’d rather send Ashcrofts a suffix L R380 donor and fit that instead - there’s virtually no difference in cost and I’d have a slightly nicer, slightly stronger gearbox with the option to include a couple of strength upgrades. I’d then pop the original LT77 into storage. I have plenty of experience with dealing with R380 installations in Series and Defender vehicles, but zero with a Range Rover. I’m working on the assumption that with the right combination of parts that it can be fitted as a straight swap. I’d like to imagine that the R380 RR/Disco TDi bellhousing is 1” shorter than the LT77S TDi bellhousing to compensate for the longer mainbox. If that’s the case then I’m really hoping that the gear selector would pop up in the cab in exactly the same place and that the props/crossmember needed would be a standard LR parts bin component. The engine is being stripped for a refresh so I really don’t mind swapping flywheel housings/sumps onto the original 200TDi if that would make the swap a little more elegant. I’m more than happy to spend 6-months tracking down every part I might need but as this is an otherwise 100% factory vehicle, I don’t want to introduce any installation compromises (like missing bellhousing fasteners) like you often see with non RR installations. im hoping I can assemble a kit of parts as if Land Rover had offered a standalone R380 retrofit kit, like they did with the 200/300TDi kits from the ‘90s. I did note this thread on a clutch issue with a similar arrangement Thank you.
  6. @Bigj66 completely off topic. But aside from a stunning mk3 there, your garage looks superb. Could I ask if you know who supplied the building/the spec? I've been going back and forth with suppliers for ages and my latest has gone dark. Feel free to PM if preferred.
  7. That’s a really nice bit of info, thank you. I’ll add one to the spares pile to trial.
  8. Sorry Fridge, that'll be my fault for groundlessly mentioning reliability - wouldn't want to give the impression I thought that there is anything wrong with that approach. I simply meant that a fixed fan is simpler (to my simple brain) and has fewer failure points than viscous and certainly not that electric is inherently unreliable. The vehicle I'm building is a bit of a passion project to see if I can assemble a SWB V8 with parts choices that are close to those the factory would have considered acceptable in a production vehicle - had they stuck with selectable 4x4 and had access to the same parts bins we have today, and doing so without chassis mods and to try and have the engine bay appear period -at least at a passing glance. Land Rover have always used engine driven fans on their production utility models so I'm hoping to retain that feature as part of the build - even though it would be far, far easier to just use electric fans. Taking on board all the advice above (and the video, which was great) - I think its now a case of dry building the thing up in the chassis with the radiator in situ and trying a combination of factory viscous setups as a starter to see how close to a nice fit I can get. I understand that the fan design is optimised to set distances between the blades and the radiator and that where the cowl sits in relation to the blade tips is also relevant, so I'll pick up a few serpentine fan/viscous hub assemblies, will grab some measurements off the family P38/Disco II and anything else I can find with a Serp front end and try them and work out where I need to lose any dimensions to make it all work well. The cowl will be a nice complex bit of metal shaping, so that'll be a nice project to look forward to. If I can't make it work, I'll revert back to electric fans and call it a day.
  9. duly noted, thanks Bowie. To be fair if I do deviate at all from a standard Viscous unit (matched fan and clutch) then I'd be buying a purpose build fixed fan and would most likely order one from the US that's intended for one of their domestic V8s. For example, Flex-O-Lite stock a large number of fans in various sizes and widths that are intended for American V8s. This one caught my eye, its a reverse-rotation (so should be good for a Serp pump), it comes in a number of sizes (this particular one is 17inch to match the standard Rover size) and the description even mentions it being used to replace a factory clutch-driven fan. If I'm going 'custom', then a route like that seems the safest bet - at least I know the fan is intended to be mounted on the front of the engine and should cope with the correct rotation and RPM. I don't know whether the pump bearings would be happy with having a fixed fan, but I suspect it would make little difference to them when compared with a viscous unit. That particular fan is only 1-3/4" wide. Having started down that path, there are others of course, from companies like Derale who make V8-type fans in reverse rotation at the correct sizes and their width comes down to as low as 1-1/8". So, if I do go for a fixed fan, it looks like the American aftermarket is the best bet (none of them are very expensive and I have a PO box in the US that I use regularly, so shipping is nothing) - I can order a fan of the correct diameter that is intended for an engine of that size and, if I get lucky, I'm sure I could find one of them that could supply a fan on request with the centres drilled with a PCD and pilot hole to suit my needs. A fixed fan does have some additional appeal to me with less chance of failure and, as this engine bay is intended to look like its come straight out of the 1960s (the serp belt and lack of distributor being the only giveaway) then a fixed fan does remind me of the original Buick 215 design. So - it looks like the slimmest reverse rotation viscous unit is going to be that from an intermediate serp 3.9. And that just leaves the question - if I do move to a fixed fan, provided it is mounted correctly on the water pump and spaced correctly/safely from the belt, does anyone see any pitfalls in mounting a fixed fan on a pump hub that was intended to receive a viscous unit? When it comes to mounting a fixed fan on a serp pulley, I suppose there's two options: I could bolt it onto the serpentine pulley using three bolts right through into the pump boss, I might make use of the redundant three holes as an alternative. This would effectively make the fan and pulley a solid unit - I do have concerns that any movement in the fan could affect the alignment of the belt. I could turn up a threaded boss that engages onto the threaded shaft in the centre of the pulley just like the viscous unit did and bolts in turn to the fan. Provided it is properly balanced I would assume that that would be a far better solution from an engineering perspective?
  10. thanks all. I have a lathe and access to a milling machine so making a hub should be no issue. It seems to be a threaded boss onto the serp water pump and I can cut such threads. I think the best course of action may be to buy a series of fans off eBay with their respective hubs and measure them all up to find the closest fitting solution.
  11. Thanks all. The confirmation on the reverse running is very handy. Snagger thanks for the tip re: not simply flipping a fan - I'd need to find a generic fixed fan of the correct size that is designed for that rotation. I did notice that the P38 fan is very very thin (or at least the band around the fan is), but as Snagger points out above, while the fan surround itself is very thin, the blades flare forwards, sitting quite far away from the belts, whereas the 3.9 interim fan has the blades butting right back up against the serpentine belt. Its reminds me of the offset on road wheels - as if the 3.9 has a much higher offset than the 4.0, so it sits tighter to the block. I'm going off photos for this conclusion, it might all be an optical illusion, so I'll just have to find some engines and take a tape measure to them. 3.9 Intermediate Serp: P38A 4.0 V8 (belt not attached): Disco 2 4.0 V8 engine: From those images, I would guess that a P38A distributorless timing cover, coupled with the viscous unit and fan from a 3.9 intermediate serp would be the fractionally tighter option. I'll certainly have a look at the Vitesse fan to see if it can work. On the electric fan, I know it is how V8 conversions have been done for a long time - but I really want to try and exhaust all options for an engine driven fan first. The engine I'm building is all about adding reliability, incorporating all the P38A developments (except the 92mm bore) so an electric fan doesn't quite align with all that, fine and everything, but not aligned with what I'm hoping to achieve.
  12. some great pics of your build there - thanks for sharing, plenty of inspiration.
  13. Ps: I think that the serpentine waterpumps (as I’ll be using) might have run in the opposite rotation to the earlier bee-belt pumps. So if sticking with serpentine then an intermediate serpentine 3.9 V8 fan seems to be a lot tighter to the block than anything from the P38. here’s some good pics of an intermediate 3.9: https://www.simmonites.com/shop/engines/reconditioned/3-9-rover-v8-serpentine-engine-land-rover/ I’ve still got Disco IIs and 50th defenders to check. guess if I go with a fixed fan then I’d need to flip it to run the opposite way.
  14. Been getting some great advice on the planned Rover V8 conversion into my SIIA. I picked up the engine this weekend and am off collecting various bits to reduce the length. it is being converted to a P38 distributorless setup with serpentine belt/pulleys. As far as I’m aware that results in the shortest possible RV8 - much shorter than the traditional mix of SD1 and P6 parts. But, I’d really like to keep a mechanical fan and I think I have space to fit one neatly. does anyone happen to know the slimmest possible engine-driven fan setup that can be fitted? I’m happy to go all the way back to a fixed fan (with a custom boss to fit the 3-bolt serp water pump) or I’d look at any of the viscous fans too. There’s the width of the fan to consider as well as the length of the shaft that it runs on. happy to track down obscure parts (101, LDV, etc) if there is a combination that keeps the fan as close to the block as possible.
  15. I'll have a look into it. Even bypassing the universal ones, it does seem that custom ones from similar companies are coming in at about half the price. I might take a leaf out of the Retropower book and make one out of cardboard and toilet roll tubes complete with flanges so I can physically bolt it in to trial it before sending it off to be made in aluminium. It would be nice to have the upper surface bead rolled to match the pressings in the original brass item, if I find a friendly manufacturer then I could do the rolls or pressings in some blanks and supply them to be included.
  16. lovely, thank you. I'll keep an eye open for a pair once I try the engine in the chassis.
  17. That's really helpful, thank you everyone. Hi Daan - the position of the engine will be the traditional V8 conversion position (that is that the front of the bellhousing will sit in the same position as it would have in the 4-cyl from the factory. Granted I'm fitting a stumpy R380, but I've already planned on moving the transfer case backwards by 102mm to compensate), so I wouldn't have the same benefits that Fridge has had in moving the engine significantly further back. I've been planning this job for years and years so have had a long time to gather parts - I'll share the list below if its of interest: many years of too much wine and an eBay account has resulted in boxes and boxes of parts stilling awaiting the start of the build. The vehicle I have earmarked for this (lights in wings '69 SIIA SWB) is already flat packed and will be getting a new chassis and bulkhead, so its more of a V8 build rather than a conversion of an in-tact vehicle. The spec is going to be: Alisport S2A/V8-specific radiator (not bought) crossbolted 3.5V8 with distributorless P38 front cover - mounted in the 'traditional v8 conversion' position. This will be (all being well, thanks to the advice in this thread) mounted parallel to the chassis rails, offset as per 2.25 with the crank pulley centralised in the PTO hole (engine bought but not the cover) Sump - unknown, there's a few designs to play with - I plan on sitting the V8 and the original 2.25 on a bench with the fans aligned and picking a sump (P38/Disco II) that gives similar clearance but still works with the P38 front cover. Milner adaptor plate (bought) Mocal remote oil filter 9.5" clutch Stumpy suffix L defender R380 with 050A ratio layshaft (both bought) Ashcroft R380-Series transfer box adaptor (bought) Transfer box moved 102mm backwards on a second bolt-up gearbox mount (brackets will be added when ordering the chassis, which has not been bought yet - the original position crossmember will remain and still clears the box) Cut and shut gearshift remote (I have two and can weld and machine cast aluminium) to move the gearshift forward into the factory position New transfer box lever pivot bracket bolted to the back of the R380 bellhousing studs Shortened rear propshaft - but still longer than 80" specs (have but not modified) Extended front propshaft based off a solid 3.9 RR prop - it clears the gearbox crossmember without scalloping (bought but not modified) Ashcroft 4-pin or ATB 4.75 rear diff with 24-spline side gears (not bought) Ashcroft 24 spline rear halfshafts (not bought) Standard front diff (have) 10/24 spline front shafts (bought) - I've had some advice from the forum on CV conversions which I may do one day, but for now I'll stick with the UJs Heystee disc brake front swivels and Heystee 8" servo on a SIII servo pedal box (all bought) 200TDI Defender Disc/Drum/Valve/Master Cylinder setup (bought) Reinforced front axle casing (factory, have one and doesn't add anything but its a nice feature) 6.5J Defender 130 rims (bought) Reshaped bulkhead (will be new from Rob Owen) Now that, thanks to yourselves, I know that the engine can be fitted straight and level, the only bits I have left to figure out are: The absolute best exhaust manifolds to use - I'd like these to be cast due to the look I'm going for (being a 3.5 I have access to the whole LDV, MGB, Rover and Land Rover parts bins without worrying about strangling a larger engine) Whether I can keep the engine driven fan. I really want to - provided I can squeeze it behind the factory-sized Alisport radiator. I think it will fit well, but I'll need to pick the slimmest factory fan I can, so will measure up all the viscous and fixed fans I can find. I suspect a fixed steel fan on a custom boss attached to the serpentine water pump would sit tightest to the engine. I would also make a shroud and cowl to cover this - I'm hoping that a custom steel one that mirrors the factory design will look ace. Geeky, and has cost a hell of a lot over the years - but I think the setup (cooling, transmission strength and braking) would be very well matched to a standard 130bhp/185lbft V8 without having any obvious weak points. The aim is to finish the traditional V8 conversion by just changing the bear minimum of parts needed to take it up to 'production-ready' strength/reliability without any engineering compromises (rather than aiming for uprated off-road spec). The gearing took a long time to work out, but the 5-speed setup I have should give final ratios that are pretty much identical to a Series 1st-4th + OD 4th.
  18. I just mean that I never use them in practice. I'd still want the hole to line up, just for neatness.
  19. gosh - very non standard, looks great though. Thanks again.
  20. wow - thank you. As you say, it could be that I've been tricked about them being centralised in the engine bay after seeing so many pictures taken from (presumably a small) an angle. I hadn't seen so many pics that clearly show the centreline offset to the left. That could well answer my query comprehensively. The engine I have set aside for this project is a bit of a special one: its one of the 94/95 3.5L/3.500" bore 'service' engines that were based around the 38A block - but without all the finished machining done (like a 3.5L version of a 3.9 'interim' bottom end). I'll be having the machining finished (crossbolting, cam retainer, line bore to 2.5" journals for a 4.0 crank and clearances for counter weights and top hat liners) so it should end up being the strongest possible (factory-ish) variant of the 3.5L BOP/Rover V8 (complete overkill for such a low output engine, but its an engine build that has been on my bucket list for years) - so I should be free to use a P38 front cover with megajolt as well as the more snug 3.5L cast manifolds. I mention this as its really good to see in your photos above how dramatic an effect there is on engine length when using the smaller pump and thin timing cover: really transforms the installation even compared to the old-school efforts where people were tracking down SD1 covers and P6 pumps. Just out of curiosity, in the image above with the blue and red/cream series engine bays, is the engine mounted in the standard location? (ie. factory series bellhousing plus milner-type adaptor plate), or has the gearbox been moved back at all? I'm hoping when I mock this up that I'll be able to squeeze a viscous fan behind the factory radiator with a custom shroud rather than switching to electric.
  21. Over the years I think I've read every thread I can find on V8 conversions - but there's one thing I haven't got my head around and that's the resultant alignment in the chassis (SIIA SWB). Most of the well publicised 'traditional knowledge and tricks' associated with these conversion kits comes from a time before the 38A block castings/serpentine covers as well as the Disco I, II and P38 parts bins contents were commonly available - in my case, while I have a full Milner conversion kit I'll actually be using very little of it. I have an engine with a choice of serpentine covers (interim/dizzy or distributorless -so much more clearance for the front pulleys), a Mocal remote oil filter kit, a choice of sumps and would be mocking up the unit in the old chassis and ordering a new chassis with mounts exactly where I want them - so while its all still very tight, there's a fair bit more flexibility in terms of where the engine is fitted. But I'm convinced I must be missing something obvious that I wanted to run past the forum as I'm aware there are plenty of people who have made use of these later V8 parts to good effect in their Series LRs. I think I'm right in saying that with a factory 2.25, the engine block sits level in relation to the chassis rail (as in it isn't angled nose or tail up) and the crank centre is parallel to the chassis rails but offset a few inches to the Left Hand Side (UK passenger side) with the crank shaft pulley lined up with the tubular hole in the front crossmember for the PTO/starting handle. But whenever I see a V8 conversion, it looks like the crank pulley is typically positioned centrally in the chassis (so if a starting handle were to be used, not that it would, then the crossmember hole would not line up with the pulley dog) - which must mean that with the gearbox mounts left were they are that the engine/mainbox combo runs slightly diagonally across the gap between the chassis rail. I'm also seeing some that seem to be angled tail down (rear main seal lower than the front). Obviously its a LR and the engine position is determined by the installer's choice of mount position, but are there fundamental reasons why a V8 couldn't be fitted in the same orientation/with the same crank position as a 2.25 - so paralell to the chassis rails and offset slightly to the left/passenger side? Any pics would be very helpful - I'll be keeping the gearbox/adaptor plate in the factory location and would really like to keep a traditional (albeit uprated - like this) radiator position rather than fitting a crossflow rad on top of the front crossmember.
  22. It’s this: but I’ve never tried it, so don’t know if it’s as strong as a factory weld or if it’s more decorative.
  23. Thanks everyone. good food for thought. The building drawings are being finalised now and then off lift-shopping.
  24. Thank you - on the arm front I’m sorted. The chap I’ve bought it from reconditions and upgrades them and also makes arms - he told me how to do it and if you have a lathe, which I do, and make a simple rod bender then you can make them in any shape you need for the price of 12mm copper rod. That was the thing that tipped me over into buying one.
  25. I’ve just ordered myself a new spot welder (nice thing, a Tecna 7902P - does 2x2.5mm steel and has a pulse setting). It was ordered primarily for non-LR projects and steel bodywork repair, but I keep coming back to the trick on YouTube of using it for aluminium by sandwiching the panels between two thin pieces of steel. I do have lots of Series bodywork repairs to do (tubs, seatbases, etc) for a couple of rebuilds and have already got an AC/DC tig set but I’m only just learning how to use the kit and expect it to take me years before I’m vaguely OK with ally. Using the spot welder would be infinitely easier and would be more in keeping with factory. so the question is: while I know that using the steel sandwich truck, that I can now spot weld aluminium (and it’s alloys), has anyone used this trick themselves and if so - how does the strength of the weld compare to factory spots? Im debating whether to rely on the tricked spot welds as direct replacements for factory, whether to put them down twice as frequently or even whether to do spots in the factory position and use some panel bond epoxy in the gaps to guarantee at least factory strength.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website you agree to our Cookie Policy