Jump to content

smo

Settled In
  • Posts

    1,785
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by smo

  1. valid topic for debate. If si can test his products and still sell at a reasonable price what's stopping others?

    I think the thing to remember is the X-eng products are engineered and tested - not certified.

    The only thing stopping others from doing the same is lack of knowledge and lack of willingness to do so in the rush to make a quick buck rather than product a quality and safe product.

  2. I'm sure its not Jez - i'm merely debating if its nessecary, if we want it or if its even feasable.

    I think some kind of assurance its been tested on critical componants would be good, i understand that its an expensive process but perhaps manufacturers of small volume parts should at least do what Si of X-Eng (hope you dont mind me using you as an example!) does and back up his new products with facts and figures which are supported by engineering principles and real world testing, which he is not worried about sharing - cearly a sign of a man who takes pride in his work and understands what he is doing.

    That of couse leaves the problems of dodgy welds by people and other manufacturing issues - not sure how to overcome them!

  3. With all this business about working on our own cars, making mods or fitting modified parts (as in not manufacturer standard fitment) is there a reason why we dont have rules demanding certification to avoid problems such as the broken trailing arms which are beign discussed.

    Now i dont know the cost of the certification, but there are such services for BSI kitemarks for automotive products, or perhaps TUV certification....

    Any thoughts? Should we insist products are tested, should it be limited to safety critical parts???

  4. Is it necessary to cage a whole lenght of a 110, would a front cage be adequate enough ?I think it should provide a pivot and still ptotect the middle seat occupants. Maybe only having it on the front part would reduce the weight ?

    Perfectly acceptable, you will always have a driver, but will you always have passengers??? Its just a case of thinking about your usage of the vehicle and then deciding if you really need the rear protection offered by a full cage.

    Just make sure it has an internal hoop with braces if you go frontal only.

  5. Glad to hear you are ok as it looks nasty. However i doubt youll get salvage rights from that mess, itll be a cat B which means that a salvage place can only break for spares, itll never go on the road again and lets face it with no panels, bent chassis and untold other damage you are better off with a second hand replacement.

  6. It should be noted that the FEA packages in all of these CAD programs are very very average.....

    Another one worth looking at is Autodesk Inventor, it is faster to learn than Solidworks, it also has some features which are very useful that Solid works doesnt have (on the other hand it is also missing some)

    Care to quantify what is wrong with COSMOS FEA - you'll find it is superb actually. Also care to quantify why inventor is better than SW, the features are almost identical and i definatley dispuite the claims it is easier to learn.

    My credentials are on this post (or another similar one) - care to share yours to back these claims?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website you agree to our Cookie Policy