Jump to content

Salisbury Axle


Bigj66

Recommended Posts

Trying to find out what year the Salisbury axle was first introduced on the 109 6 cylinder models. Would a 1966 109 have a Salisbury axle fitted as standard? Are there any differences between the LWB chassis that have the Rover or Salisbury axles? For example would a 2a chassis have the rear spring outriggers mounted outboard of the chassis rails?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wasn't standard, but it might have been an option, or was that "ENV" axles? 

The Salisbury diff is longer, I think, so the prop shaft is shorter, other than that, no major differences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cheers. So am I right in thinking that the only way to determine if a 2a is genuine is to check the transmission brake mounting on the chassis? A 2a with S3 bulkhead and Salisbury axle but a 2a front panel and wings is ringing alarm bells for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gazzar said:

As above, if you want originally, look away. Landrovers can be identify fluid over time.

G.

Cheers, it wasn’t so much originality as opposed to legality if you get my drift.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, I understand. If it's otherwise okay, refit a rover LWB axle, put a 4 pin diff in it, with Ashcroft half shafts and you're at Salisbury strength.

G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gazzar said:

Ah, I understand. If it's otherwise okay, refit a rover LWB axle, put a 4 pin diff in it, with Ashcroft half shafts and you're at Salisbury strength.

G.

I’m okay with it having the Salisbury and in the short term, even the S3 bulkhead, so long as everything else checks out ok. I’ve asked for the first three digits of the chassis number that will let me compare against a list that Glencoyne have on their website.

Edit: I’ve just had a thought. Wouldn’t a 1966 LWB have underseat fuel tanks or a filler next to the door? Looking at photos of other similar vehicles I can’t see a rear wing filler cap. 

Edited by Bigj66
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, most likely. Rear tank is a S3 thing. 

Here's a thing, what form is the chassis rails, is it two "C" sections welded together, or 4 sides welded together? 

G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Gazzar said:

Yes, most likely. Rear tank is a S3 thing. 

Here's a thing, what form is the chassis rails, is it two "C" sections welded together, or 4 sides welded together? 

G.

To be honest I’ve only seen the photos but I think I now have enough information to decide that the vehicle is a S3 with a 2a front end and not a ‘66 2a.

Disappointed but I won’t be going any further with it and hope that no other unsuspecting person buys it.

Thanks all for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website you agree to our Cookie Policy