Popular Post FridgeFreezer Posted June 4, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted June 4, 2019 1 hour ago, landroversforever said: Oh Jamie that properly creased me up!! You mean this? 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil110 Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketomcat Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Well they've nailed a snorkel to it but it looks like they've knocked the top off it already. Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landroversforever Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Just now, miketomcat said: Well they've nailed a snorkel to it but it looks like they've knocked the top off it already. Mike And the article said something about it being integrated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FridgeFreezer Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Couple of different angles of the same thing: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_grieve Posted June 4, 2019 Author Share Posted June 4, 2019 Regardless of the defender replacement for a moment, it’s awesome that Land Rover’s actually supporting conservation. I know there’s always been a marketing angle to it but the targets of their corporate responsibility could have been anything. I think the pictures here illustrate fairly well the points I have been making throughout this thread about (the lack of) wheel travel and ground clearance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diff Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 They haven't knocked the snorkel top off, because it doesn't have one. The main air intake opening for the snorkel is facing backwards next to the left hand front window on the A pillar. Regards, Diff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miketomcat Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 1 hour ago, Diff said: They haven't knocked the snorkel top off, because it doesn't have one. The main air intake opening for the snorkel is facing backwards next to the left hand front window on the A pillar. Regards, Diff. I was being slightly tongue in cheek...... Mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynic-al Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 (edited) I thought the same about wheel travel when I saw the pictures but then I always think if you forget about play days and competitions how much do you really need? The video also helps promote it as the vehicle of choice for American business men / women and gives a strong residual value amongst African poachers. I wonder if it will have a rifle rack as an optional extra? The video could do with a few shots with a roarding V8 Edited June 5, 2019 by Cynic-al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reb78 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 (edited) So, Discovery 4.1 Commercial would have been a better name.....? The only thing Defender about that is that they have attempted to limit the access at the back by putting door hinges on the side instead of a flappy tailgate! Edited June 5, 2019 by reb78 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mo Murphy Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Just another different sized clone of what they already have, innovative and bold individual design sacrificed at the alter of blandness. I hope it bankrupts them. Mo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynic-al Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 I prefer a side opening door, it makes for easier forklift loading or lifting heavy things in, your not trying to reach over the tailgate, everyone who's done a course will tell you that's not right . It's one of the things I liked about the discovery 1 - 4 and is one of the things I miss on modern pickups, you can no longer fold the tailgate flat as the rear bumpers are too big. The only one I know of is the pleb spec Mercedes, the higher spec ones have the more stylish bumpers so your back to not being able to fold it. Although I appreciate the big doors are less convenient in a car park, even when your parking the little Jimny at work you have to decide if you need to be in the boot before you park it. Luckily it doesn't have a boot so it's not usually a problem. I guess it comes down to your market for the vehicle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snagger Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 It is great that LR support such charities, but no way will they be able to afford to maintain those vehicles in the future unless LR does that for them for free. Vehicle maintenance in Africa is something only wealthy organisations can afford, which is why the Toyota utilities do so well there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deep Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 11 hours ago, Cynic-al said: I thought the same about wheel travel when I saw the pictures but then I always think if you forget about play days and competitions how much do you really need? In a vehicle specifically targeted at being used off road, as stated in the lion video, lots is better than very little. My work supplied Mitsubishi 4WD has far less travel than my 110 and you notice it, even on rutted tracks. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happyoldgit Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Clever bit of marketing supposedly helping to track vulnerable species, should appeal to the wannabe adventurers and tree huggers. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mo Murphy Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Will they have beards ? Mo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eightpot Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 So I'm working my way down a rocky track with a bit of sideslope, I've got a full tank of fuel, a jerry can or two plus a couple with water, another 200kg of food, beer, camping gear, spares and tools and a roof tent up top, just normal top-heavy overland stuff - it's raining a bit and nice and slippy, and now I'm on 3 wheels - nah, not fancying that thanks 😐 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happyoldgit Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 1 hour ago, Mo Murphy said: Will they have beards ? Mo No, lions have manes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reb78 Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 I cant imagine Mo with a beard...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Escape Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 8 hours ago, Eightpot said: So I'm working my way down a rocky track with a bit of sideslope, I've got a full tank of fuel, a jerry can or two plus a couple with water, another 200kg of food, beer, camping gear, spares and tools and a roof tent up top, just normal top-heavy overland stuff - it's raining a bit and nice and slippy, and now I'm on 3 wheels - nah, not fancying that thanks 😐 I'm not saying you don't need articulation, but it's not like the old Defender is that stable, especially when adding weight to an already top-heavy vehicle. The Range Rover, sitting lower (and wider for later versions) feels better suited. I wouldn't be surprised if the new Defender actually has a lower centre of gravity, and almost certainly a wider track. The air suspension will handle the extra load and keep the vehicle level. And the standard traction control etc will probably do a better job preventing a slide than the average driver. So while I understand where you're coming from, I don't think stability when heavily loaded will be much of a problem for the new Defender. Watching the Tusk movies, the shape is actually growing on me. Particularly the rear. I hope the production version sticks to round headlamps, not an umptieth variation on the same front used all over the current range. Filip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mo Murphy Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 8 hours ago, Happyoldgit said: No, lions have manes. In the main ? Mo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happyoldgit Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 1 hour ago, Mo Murphy said: In the main ? Mo Males mainly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snagger Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 12 hours ago, Happyoldgit said: Clever bit of marketing supposedly helping to track vulnerable species, should appeal to the wannabe adventurers and tree huggers. Which is the vulnerable species? The animals, tree huggers or Land Rover? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snagger Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 2 hours ago, Escape said: I'm not saying you don't need articulation, but it's not like the old Defender is that stable, especially when adding weight to an already top-heavy vehicle. The Range Rover, sitting lower (and wider for later versions) feels better suited. I wouldn't be surprised if the new Defender actually has a lower centre of gravity, and almost certainly a wider track. The air suspension will handle the extra load and keep the vehicle level. And the standard traction control etc will probably do a better job preventing a slide than the average driver. So while I understand where you're coming from, I don't think stability when heavily loaded will be much of a problem for the new Defender. Watching the Tusk movies, the shape is actually growing on me. Particularly the rear. I hope the production version sticks to round headlamps, not an umptieth variation on the same front used all over the current range. Filip Ultimately, LR are relying on complex, expensive and vulnerable electronic systems to make up for **** mechanical design. They should be using those system in addition to long travel suspension and sensible wheels and tyres, with items like oil coolers and exhausts tucked up out of harms way, rather than using gadgets in place of good mechanical design. Videos like this make it ever more evident to those in the know, like us, that the new Defender (Offender or Imposter may be more suitable names) is just a D5 with a body kit and is no utility vehicle, just another Chelsea Tractor, and yet again LR choose to compete with their own products rather than other brands, furthering their own financial decline. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FridgeFreezer Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 1 hour ago, Snagger said: Ultimately, LR are relying on complex, expensive and vulnerable electronic systems to make up for **** mechanical design. Bull.The TC system isn't complex or vulnerable - it's using technology that's been around for 30+ years already. I'd take Eightpot's scenario in something with HDC over a Defender, D1 or RRC any day. It might not be the entertaining option, but it's definitely the most sure-footed, wheel in the air or not. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.