Interestingly enough, here in New Zealand, the same legislation has just been introduced, with almost no fuss from the 4wd lobby. It is now illegal for vehicles with SRS (airbags) or engineered crumple zones to be fitted with rigid (non-approved) bullbars. The ARB type which has been crash tested and approved is okay, as are the soft rubber/abs ones available from the factory. Vehicles manufactured before (I think) 1996 which generally dont have airbags anyway are exempt. This means my 78 2dr RRC can have what ever I want to put on teh front of it - subject to restrictions as to dimension, rake angle and lack of spikes/blades/ rams...
So what you guys are discussing happening in the UK doesnt suprise me much.
The government agency I work for (Transit NZ) is in the process of merging with the road safety agency (Land transport NZ), so I will be working with the people behind the ban in a few months. As a civil engineer (who specialises in roading and traffic), I hate to admit it but i`m happy for the legislation. There are numerous studies out there which show the serious adverse effects of rigid bumpers in accidents. I note a previous poster referred to anecdotal evidence of higher injury rates among modern vehicle fitted with bull bars. He`s bang on the money. Even the standard girder type fitted to my S2 bent when I ran into a corolla (his fault) if it`d had a high bar on it, instead of crushing the section of his door just under the window, his head would have come into contact with a chunk of steel tube - resulting in his liklely serious injury or death.
The argument that people should be responsible for their own safety i.e. that roads are for cars, and pedestrians shouldnt be there anyway - a lot of peds are either young <12 or elderly, both groups having impaired abilities when it comes to juding a[pproach speed and gap acceptance. These are the people who a reduction in speed from 50kmh to 30kmh in urban areas and the removal of rigid protection bars will benefit. I would estimate that the vast majority of bull bars are un-needed and for looks. Obviously us LR owners are slightly different, but how many discoveries and range rovers with road tyres do you see with bars fitted?
May be its me, and my job which makes me think this way, but i cringe driving through towns sometimes in the RRC, knowing whats likely to happen to anyone who walks in front of it. not that I intend to sell them and buy a prius covered in bubble wrap, but anything whch protects anyone silly enough to get hit by my car has to be a good thing. Maybe its because I cycle to work 2 days a week and dodge the maniacs in cars, so i`m aware how scary it can be on the other side of the windscreen.
Yes being hit be any 4x4 is going to hurt, but compared to the relativley flat front of a LR, concentraing that force in a smaller round tube is not a good thing for survivability. Just my 2c worth.
I know i`m a stirrer, but someone has to do it.