Siggy,
The following is an extract from the Bio-Power website:
"...In Germany, Italy, Poland, USA, Australia and many other countries around the world, there is no charge of Duty on the use of non-fossil fuels for any purpose including transport. This is because the taxation in the European Union only applies to 'Mineral' hydrocarbon fuels, and not to organic hydrocarbon fuels. It is clear that Britain is a very long way behind our European partners in providing the legal framework to encourage and foster a viable bio-fuel industry. We hear plenty of 'Green Speak' from politicians, but little 'Green Do' from the British government.
In recognition of the need to address the issues of Global Warming and Climate Change, Britain is also signatory to the Non-Fossil Fuels treaty. We have made an undertaking described in the 'Non-Fossil Fuel Obligation' (NFFO) to reduce the use of fossil fuels and encourage the introduction of renewable energy. Britain has since attempted to reduce the rate of change to the absolute minimum. This is very much an example of fiddling whilst Rome burns, except in the case of Global Warming it is the future of the whole planet that is so seriously at risk. The government claims that the NFFO applies only to fuels used in the generation of electricity and does not relate to fuels used for transport purposes, yet this amounts to a very significant part of the carbon emission into the atmosphere. It is our view that the obligation must apply to the use of transport fuels if the purpose of the undertaking is to be achieved at all. In our view the scope must be broadened to cover the use of all fossil fuels in any situation, including high energy industries like cement manufacture, and transport fuels. We also argue that the proposed extent of change from fossil to renewable fuels is far from adequate to save the fate of the planet..."
I think in the light of this and our governments commitment to the Kyoto treaty they would find it very hard to justify any further increases in duty on bio fuels, particularly in the face of effective lobbying. It would also help a great deal if the opposition and who ever eventually leads them could be encouraged to make a greater commitment to addressing the issue.
In addition, if we lessened our dependency on the use of oil there would be less of a reason for conflict in the middle east.
I also think those who object to 4x4's in general would find it very much harder if the 4x4 movement championed the cause of bio-fuels, in particular the use of veggie oil.
So whilst your idea is sound and with the best intentions, in principle it's not going to work because folk will still need to use their vehicles. By switching to fuels such as those that are produced from used vegetable fat, for example, people can still use their cars whilst sticking two fingers up at the oil companies.
Because the government is committed to reduce car dependency in order to cut CO2 emmissions (and congestion, which is a seperate issue), fuel prices will need to be kept high, especially if the government want to meet their targets, so it is very likely that fuel will need to go over £1 a litre and remain there.
Bio-Powers V100 fuel is between 75pence and 80pence a litre and if some of the good folk who are producing this fuel could get funding to build bigger plants I would imagine the cost per litre would come down further.
It seems that there are several other benefits in using vegetable oil, making it worthy of further investigation, which I intend to do and will gladly let everyone here know the outcome.
And just in case anyone is wondering I am in no way connected with Bio-power, I just find their ethos attractive in addition to the prospect of running the landy and not having to give any more of my money to an oil company for the privilege.
Jon.