Paul Humphreys Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 Have a look at his thread on Difflock http://forum.difflock.com/viewtopic.php?t=50894&start=30 Then send a letter of objection to them closing it. Then state on the PCC letter (picture in thread) that it is a ROAD. Paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8 Freak Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 Will be done matey... Can you see if you have an email address as well to add to the number of responses... :-) Neil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Humphreys Posted September 10, 2011 Author Share Posted September 10, 2011 I cannot find an email address, but I have emailed a PCC email address to see if I can get one. But if you read the "flyer" they have posted they are planning to stop people driving it, by this they are saying is drivable now!! Paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
landrover598 Posted September 10, 2011 Share Posted September 10, 2011 The've removed the sign saying no motor vehicles aswell? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Humphreys Posted September 10, 2011 Author Share Posted September 10, 2011 I belive that sign has been removed for months, but it is a few years since I was down that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Humphreys Posted September 11, 2011 Author Share Posted September 11, 2011 Some more info. 'Although the GAP is marked as a restricted Byway that does not totally remove the ability for vehciles to use the route if one of the conditions under Section 67(2) of the NERC Act 2006 can be proven. If the route is exempt from NERC and many people think it may be then removing the existing TRO to vehicles could open it up to use all year, which sounds great. However the reason for the original TRO was due to over use by vehciles and if this happened again the Brecon Beacons National Park now have the power to implement TRO's and would probably implement a permanent TRO to vehciles closing the route completely. Therefore we are better off maintaining the existing TRO where some access is still possible'. Hope this makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.