Jump to content

TSD

Settled In
  • Posts

    1,144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Posts posted by TSD

  1. 5 hours ago, joedoesnotlikelandrovers said:

    .. it doesn't make sense as to why it would stop everything from starting the jeep.

    You'll get no help throwing around language like that :SVAgoaway:

    OK, now we know which diagram to look at, fuse #28 seems to be the renumbered version of the fuse #9 I mentioned above.

    It goes to connector C0277, which is tucked in somewhere around that fusebox bracket. It does seem it shouldn't be connected to anything from there, but it's obviously the next place to look.

    Follow the link for the relevant page in the excellent connector library, which I suspect LR published because they felt guilty about their appalling circuit diagrams :rolleyes:

     

     

  2. Not sure about Fuse #28, I didn't think a Td5 had that many fuses....

    Fuse #3 (of the 'engine compartment' fusebox) is 30A, and has a brown/purple wire. It feeds the rear screen heater and the switch on the dash.

    If it has aircon, Fuse #9 (of the 'passenger compartment' fusebox) is 30A and has a brown/purple wire, which becomes plain brown at a joint somewhere and feeds the front blower motor.

    Wiring diagrams etc. are available here

     

  3. 2 hours ago, Snagger said:

    Was that the one where it had been partly restored by the owner but vandals burned down his garage and little was left intact?

    That's the one. I had the strong impression that a lot of things were replaced because it was quicker/easier, and at the cost of a lot of originality. I'm hardly a rivet counter, and have no interest in Jeeps, but it did feel like it had been sacrificed to making a tv programme.

     

    • Like 1
  4. There was one episode where they rebuilt an old Jeep, and replaced so much of it I thought the 'jeopardy' element was whether the poor owner was well enough to stand up and deck the pair of them. (Or maybe I was just offended on his behalf.) By and large a decent program though, IMO.

    In a slightly similar vein, I find 'Shed and Buried' to be pleasant viewing, especially as the profits they seem to make would rarely even cover the diesel bill.

  5. On my late 300tdi (so '98), the lower bearing was the lower bearing was 22.5mm id, 35.7mm od, 9.5mm wide, and marked INA F-49273.2

    I don't know if the bearing is the same in the various different columns (at least 3 different part numbers). There was a change around 2008, but I would guess there's a decent chance the bearing is the same size.

     

  6. Just found the original thread where this was discussed.

    Are you still wanting to do the same thing - flash two different LEDs with the 'Alarm simulator' board - or something different? This reminded me I was going to use it for the low coolant alarm on 2Bex, but I have a feeling I forgot and wired it to a spare position on the warning light panel instead!

    • Like 1
  7. 23 hours ago, Red110 said:

    I´ll try both ways if I can't get somebody to fit the VDO gauge.

    A bit of a subjective opinion, but having owned both the VDO Vision and the Td5 speedo, the Td5 speedo is a better choice.

    The LCD display in the Td5 unit is larger, better lit and much easier to read. (While the two units look similar, they use completely different electronics). The connection to the LCD in the Vision unit is flimsy, and quite likely to fail due to vibration and presence of moisture. I'm not certain (as I don't have one in bits right now) but I think that the Td5 display mount is more robust.

    It's simple to wire in the Vision unit in place of the Td5 one, but you lose the alarm LED and the low fuel warning light function if you are using them currently.

    As discussed, changing the mileage on the Td5 speedo is pretty easy. If you already have a working Td5 speedo, even everything needed to do the job yourself, including a soldering iron, would still be cheaper than buying a new VDO Vision unit :D

     

    • Like 1
  8. On 4/11/2023 at 7:20 AM, miketomcat said:

    Not wishing to scare you but TSD had a similar issue with his ibex build. He got the engine running then left it for a while, when he came to start it again it wouldn't. Turned out to be diesel bug the FIP was packed full to the point it had to be replaced, I think the injectors were done as well.

    It wasn't diesel bug in my case, just corrosion caused by water suspended in the fuel dropping out when left standing for a long time. The FIP was clogged solid and had to be rebuilt. There was no fuel system for there to be diesel bug living in, the last time I ran it was from a jerrycan on the wing. That was only 3 years ago, parked in a dry warmish workshop. Sadly, not the first time its happened to me.

     

  9. 3 hours ago, Chicken Drumstick said:

    It is interesting how so many Land Rover owners seem to own multiple Land Rovers. In fact I know very few owners with just one.

    It's all about getting the total reliability up... If one starts 80% of the time, then one of two should start around 96% of the time (*) ;) I own four LR derived vehicles... draw your own conclusions :blink:

    (*) Maybe... I hated probability in maths

  10. On 4/2/2023 at 7:14 AM, OllyAllsop said:

    I'm open to absolutely any advice.

    I can only give the same advice I always give when asked this question - Don't do it! Defenders are slow, noisy, draughty, leaky, thirsty, rusty and unreliable. In todays market they are also hugely overpriced. This last one is opinion, all the previous points are just acknowledged facts.

    If none of the above puts you off, then Welcome! and don't worry, everyone else here is mad too . Also you should be aware that LRs are dangerously addictive, even in small doses. In the long term, one is rarely enough :im-ok-smiley-emoticon:

    • Like 2
  11. Copied from another forum where I found it when I had the same problem, putting a kitchen worktop in the back of the D3.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Length of Projection: Not exceeding 1 metre
    Action if load projects rearwards: No requirements specified
    Action if load projects forwards: No requirements specified

    Length of Projection: More than 1 metre, but not exceeding 2 metres
    Action if load projects rearwards: End must be made clearly visible
    Action if load projects forwards: No requirements specified

    Length of Projection: More than 2 metres, but not exceeding 3.05 metres
    Action if load projects rearwards: Marker boards required
    Action if load projects forwards: Attendant and marker boards required

    Length of Projection: Exceeding 3.05 metres
    Action if load projects rearwards: Two clear working days notice to Police; attendant and marker boards required
    Action if load projects forwards: Two clear working days notice to Police; attendant and marker boards required

    These requirements are set out in Regulation 82(7) of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 (C&U).

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Amazingly, just because someone said it on the interwebz doesn't automatically make it true (not even FB apparently!), but if you're worried you can look up C&U and check it.

    • Like 1
  12. Not really much to add, except I won't fit the 130HD clutch again. When I fitted the TGV I had whatever Motor and Diesel were selling as the HD clutch option at the time, but I could smell the clutch when pushing hard on the motorway (33" tyres and overdrive). When I had gearbox problems I took the opportunity to try a 130HD clutch. It was OK for a few months, but the centre plate collapsed and all the springs escaped at the Shires 7S event. I fitted another, which didn't do much better.

    Motor and Diesel offered an 'Extra HD' clutch, with the caveat that the gearbox would rattle  (I assume the damping springs are too stiff for the rotating mass) and at a fearsome price. I have no idea what it was, as M&D had removed all the identifiable part numbers (I fully understand why, and I'm not complaining, but I don't have to like it either!). That has lasted at least 10 years and 150k miles - it's been so long I've forgotten the details.

    I had sort of mentally pencilled-in LOF for when I need another, but without any particular reasoning, other than they weren't pushing paddle clutches that have no place in a Land Rover. Like @muddy I'm suspicious when something new is held up as the ultimate based on advertising and little or no relevant track record, but I know the TGV will want something better than standard tdi.

    Given the age of every tdi out there, it might be worth getting the flywheel refaced ?

    • Like 1
  13. I sort of agree with your objections to the 300tdi and 2.8 because they are all getting on a bit, but if you have the possibility to source donors from South America, then both could be attractive options (2.8 from a Ford Ranger, 2.5 from a Merc Sprinter?). Should be a relatively easy fit, using mostly standard parts. 2.8TGV in good fettle will give decent power and torque. When new, mine was smoother and quieter than a 300tdi, though 15 years on it's pretty noisy, and a bit down on power too.

    ISTR Motor and Diesel sell an adapter for 300tdi to the Puma gearbox? (Think they also sell the 3.7 conversion mentioned above).

    If the RoW spec Puma gets the usual Puma dashboard, then don't forget to factor the cost of driving that into your sums. I've only seen one off the shelf conversion to drive the Puma dash (from a tdi/td5), and while I don't remember what it cost, I do remember thinking it was pretty spendy for £25 worth of electronics.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website you agree to our Cookie Policy