Having spent 7 years living and working in London I left at the end of 2006 - one reason being the nightmarish travelling - I commuted daily from Zone 3 into the centre and out to Sussex / Kent / Thames Valley area depending on my work, and not a day went by without some hold up or another which meant connections were missed, I was late, or worse stranded for ages. Compensation on such occasions was derisory: spend 30 mins filling in a bzyantine form, send off your ticket (which I needed to keep for my tax return) and if your delay had been over an hour and was recognised then you would eventually get a short dated travel warrant for a quarter of your return fare for that leg of the journey; by the time you deducted the cost of the stamp to send the form it was pointless as you got pennies . I rarely drove because of the costs congestion charge and extortionate parking costs meant I couldn't afford to. The GLC (or whatever it's called now) really needs to accept that public transport cannot provide a lot of the working londoner's transport needs and not everyone in London who is working is the employee of a faceless corporation which washes their dirty laundry in the developing world and pays whatever it is asked at home in order to look good. Once this new scheme is introduced what will come next? Probably broader scope (good luck on finding or being able to use public transport towards the extremities of the current zone in any event) and higher fees - the effectiveness of the congestion charge meant not enough vehicles were using the zone to pay for the enforcement so the charge went up - £8, who's that going to stop - the student nurse who works late shifts and has accomodation in a dodgy area in zone 4 which she needs to get back to, or the bankers in their Astons (most of whom arrive in so early they avoid paying anyway...). Ken has occasional good ideas and has improved the busses (but definitely not the trains - I know they're not his remit), and credit to him he does actually use the public transport he extols (I sat opposite him on a tube) but he's losing the plot. London is becoming unworkable as a place to try and live and work as a public sector worker (precisely the sort of people who Ken once professed to care about) or as someone running a small business. Anyway that's one of the reasons I left and moved down to the West Country; since the move I've bought a hybrid and not looked back .
My Land Rover is my hobby and by running it I support local businesses; now, unlike when i lived in London I may pollute a little with diesel particles but I don't go off several times a year on £5 Ryanair flights - I can't think the environment is any worse off as result.
As a parting thought, I wonder if anyone in government has actually looked at the environmental footprint of scrapping an old vehicle and constructing a new one versus maintaining and running an old, albeit less energy efficient one? Maybe they don't want to know the answer?
PS Sorry, I've just re-read this and it turned into a bit of a rant...