-
Posts
5,244 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
42
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by elbekko
-
-
12 minutes ago, miketomcat said:
Don't you think I've got enough to do, as it is I made the mistake of looking at what she'd be drawing. Ignorance is definitely bliss.
Mike
"But wouldn't it look great with little pockets in the walls here and there?"
Probably shouldn't give her any ideas...
-
1
-
-
For the manuals, you just need RAVE.
The Microcat parts manual has been pretty much webified by Land Rover themselves:
-
7 hours ago, FridgeFreezer said:
Badged as 4.0 yes, but pretty certain it was the 3.9 with 14CUX same as the RRC... Wikipedia says 1993 onwards so that would be (just) before the P38 came along and while they were still building 3.9 Classics for a few years.
Wasn't it a 4.0 GEMS? Sure looks like it in this picture:
-
1 hour ago, smallfry said:
I would never be able to sleep at night, knowing the hassle and expense it would give you.
I think I'd survive it. I have a P38, remember?
1 hour ago, smallfry said:I am being asked to sell it at least once a month. Best offer yet has been £4000.
Even crusty ones seem to be going for more than that.
-
I'll give you £500 for it if you're sick of it?
-
3 hours ago, Ed Poore said:
What was the final weight in the end? I know mild is just over the £1k/tonne here but if it's an offcut paid for by another job then it's just profit.
I'd need to check, but I think overall around 34kg?
The other place I got a quote from always counts full plates, and could only do S235. They quoted €1.89/kg for 3mm and €1.82/kg for 5mm plate.
The place I ordered from now is probably so cheap because it's an offcut. Not sure how he deals with it, but I'm guessing the 3mm stuff was all from the same plate, as the price barely increased when I added the skidplate that I had forgotten to send in at first. And that price increase was for the extra bend I think
-
1
-
-
Indeed. He had some leftover 5mm S355 that he can cut it out of, that helps with the price I'm guessing.
-
1
-
-
Order is in with the local lasering guy. The 5mm bits will be S355, the 3mm bits S235. Cradle and skidplate bent by the lasering guy, the curved plate I'll attempt to do myself. €280 ex VAT, can't complain about that.
Now hope it fits
-
4
-
-
Thanks for all the suggestions, everyone.
For the bumper build I decided to stick with Fusion 360, and trying to learn the tips & tricks. It looks like it takes a bit of a different approach, but once you get that approach down it isn't too bad.
It seems much more reliant on defining lots of planes and separate components. I'm still annoyed that you can create a lofted sheetmetal part, but it just throws errors when you try to create a flat pattern...I signed up for the Solidworks trial, and played around with it for a few minutes. The sketching is a million times better, as I remember it. But assemblies are just as much of a mess, really. And it was running in an online VM, so not quite the same user experience as having it locally.
On 5/5/2023 at 8:07 AM, Ed Poore said:I remember discussing with the chap who was our main CAD guy (he ironically also came from Autodesk) and at the time there were things back then that Inventor had been doing for years that Solidworks still couldn't do. The one that sprung to mind was translational constraints (at least that's what I called them). For example I could model a hydraulic cylinder, model a digger using that cylinder and then directly whilst editing the model move the boom and so on with it being constrained by the hydraulic rams.
Yeah, the joints in Fusion are powerful, but a right pain to set up (for me, anyway). It always tries to do exactly the opposite of what I want it to do, for some reason...
-
10 hours ago, miketomcat said:
Nah I'll have the club trailer....oh yeah and it won't be anywhere close to ready.
Pah, at the rate you're going?
It'll be good to see you there either way
-
2
-
-
Test camp at Seven Sisters then?
-
Indeed, not tightening those 4 bolts allows the heads to expand and contract more evenly, thus reducing gasket failures. It pretty much fixed the head gasket issues RV8s were known for before that.
-
And lots of people that take a perverse pleasure in fixing with electrics...
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, Stellaghost said:
Alive and well, thanks to all for pm's and and asking
got confirmation of my camping at dan- ty-ogof for seven sisters and I also bought a tent...
Regards Stephen
Glad to see you alive and well, and hope to see you and Sid at seven sisters!
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, geoffbeaumont said:
Crumple zones? On a P38...?
It has crush mounts behind the stock bumper. That's about it.
1 hour ago, ped said:If i were to fab it from scratch i could inc to the main mountings for the winch to 8mm but then skeletonize much if it reducing weight but still keeping the strength
I mostly wonder why the 8mm. Especially if there's barely any twist in the system when mounting the winch feet-forward. 5mm, especially in a U-channel, should be more than plenty strong.
Remember: as I have it now, it'll be a 5mm U, with 3mm plate welded top and bottom of the U. I don't think it'll move.
Hence my initial design brief: try to make it strong without just throwing heavy plate at it.
7 hours ago, ped said:fair enough each to their own but why spend all the effort making something not strong enough in the first place stronger when you can start with something that is already strong and will do the job without all the extra faffing about,unless you just like faffing for the sake of it
In that line of thinking I could just do a Nige and make everything out of 10mm plate. I'd rather "faff about" and try to find an optimal design. This is not a winch challenge truck either, the goal is mainly self recovery and maybe some marshalling-type stuff.
I'll try and get some drawings sent out to get stuff cut out. Would be nice to get it in by Seven Sisters, but we'll see. That's not far away and I've got a lot to do...
-
1
-
-
Sounds like a warranty issue?
You can also check the manual if there's any way to force a reboot of the system, that can fix things sometimes too.
-
2
-
-
Yeah, 8mm seems massively overkill. And I can always add bracing later on if need be, but I doubt I'll need it.
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, bishbosh said:
Ohhh it's been a long time since we had an argument about thickness of plates for winches!😁
By the time you have made 3mm stiff enough to prevent any flex cracking your alloy winch housing you would be better off with 5 or 6mm.
Bent 20mm round bar angled as suggested to pick up on both chassis leg plates is definitely the way forwards.
Talking of forwards, feet forwards will be a more efficient use of material.
My only reservation about the design overall is you will not be able to see the winch drum which I think is a mistake.
That's a good point, it would probably be wise to put another slot in it somewhere so I can see the drum.
-
2 hours ago, landroversforever said:
That's obviously dependent on how far into the bumper the chassis legs extend.
You can see that here:
On 5/15/2023 at 10:30 PM, elbekko said: -
2 hours ago, steve200TDi said:
That looks pretty good. And smart to add it to the outside plates, so a double-line pull would load both plates.
Also in line with my first thought of extending those plates out through the front plate to form a ring, but I think round bar will work and look better. -
1 hour ago, miketomcat said:
I don't think there's any problem with feet forward especially if that lower guard is removable giving good access to the winch.
Mike
Realistically the bumper will have to come off to get to the winch. But that's no huge issue, I think
-
1 hour ago, Daan said:
I think 3 mm could work, granted a flat 3 mm plate does not do much for you, but once you give it decent returns top and bottom, you have a channel that is plenty strong. My rear winch mount is just a folded channel of 3mm with the winch bolted on top of this, feet down. Lots of holes drilled into it, around 8 kg.
All you need to do is to have an as direct line of force from the winch mounting points to the chassis. The rest is just hanging around it for show.
Thanks for confirming my initial thinking. And I think with this design that line of force is about as direct as it can get.
The 5mm cradle is probably a good tradeoff in strength vs weight, and allows me to make the rest of the bumper out of thinner material.Speed holes aren't the worst idea, might be worth putting some in the bottom plate to reduce weight. And would help with drainage.
1 hour ago, Daan said:The bash plate, I would remove the slots, and just have some holes at the bottom for drainage. What has worked for me is to have a bit of box section on top of the bottom edge with a stay going upwards to the chassis to stop it bending in the middle.
Part of the radiator is behind there, and without the slots too much airflow would be blocked. The stock bumper has slots there as well, for that reason.
-
1 hour ago, Bowie69 said:
Can you not rotate the gearbox and therefore move the freespool?
That's what I did to get it in a good position for feet-forward. But not sure how well that'd work feet-down. The standard position it with the freespool straight up, and then it'd go straight into the body/grille. All solvable, but this way it actually comes out quite neatly just in front of the body line.
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, miketomcat said:
I think V2 should work out fine. I can't see in the picture but does the winch mount have a return on top and bottom edges? Mine had a return at the front (the fairlead was bolted through it) but the back (by the radiator) didn't this is where it bent, once I welded a small (about 1") return on it never moved again.
Mike
That's a good idea, I could pop a piece of angle over the back.
9 hours ago, landroversforever said:If it's any help, one of my plans if I use the ARB on the build is to convert it into a feet down mounting for the winch so I can still use my fancy fairleads. I'm not worried about making that strong enough. with ribs etc to make it behave like a much thicker piece of material.
I was under the impression that feet-forward would be easier to make stronger, lightly. Hence why that was my original design decision. Feet down could definitely work, but would make accessing the freespool a little bit harder, as it's popping up in a perfect spot right now.
Thoughts and Musings on the Ineos Grenadier
in The New Ineos Grenadier
Posted
I have the same issue in my GLE, turns out the back seat does fold flat if you take out the bottom cushion of the rear seat. Maybe something similar can be done in the Grenadier?
It's a faff though...