Jump to content

Bigj66

Forum Financial Supporter
  • Posts

    3,373
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by Bigj66

  1. 19 minutes ago, Gazzar said:

    Difference in measuring point.

    The 2 inches is the very outer lip extreme edge.

    The only measure I had that had an edge start point was a wooden British rail stationary office 12 Birmingham made ruler.

    So just to check I’ve understood this correctly.

    I’m measuring a deepest of 72mm on my ANR1354 rim and Gary has measured 2” (50mm) for the 569690 standard LWB 5.5” rim?

    So the answer to my original question is 22mm difference between the two.

  2. I used a spirit level across the rim edge and steel rule to measure the 72mm from the naive outer face. I couldn’t photo it as my hands were full. So just shy of 3”.

    I’ll visit my local Landrover shop and measure one of their LWB rims myself just to compare the two, cheers.

  3. 20 minutes ago, Landrover17H said:

    It uses ET, which for our purposes, whilst technically correct, is pretty useless. If you have ANR1534, they're the 'hooky' FC rims, actually 130 rims, and likely came from the MOD ex 'Norn Iron'. You're measuring 'deepset'.

    On ANR1534 6.5 Deepset measures: 72mm

    Why do you need LWB deepset? Can you explain what you're trying to achieve?

    You wrote:

    If they have ANR1534, they are not 1 ton rims, but they are 6.5.

    I thought that but then these are riveted and I thought the Defender 130 rims were welded?? 🤷‍♂️

    Easy to see why there’s so much confusion.

    I need the dimensions for my project. I want to know the difference between the two.

  4. 2 minutes ago, steve b said:

    There is an excellent thread on the 900Club forum - you need to join to read it - that details all the various offsets for the 6.5" rims and part nos. for all the other rims . There would appear to be at least 3 tube type 5.5" rims by part no. 

    It was linked on here somewhere a while ago and I saved it to favourites - it's title starts with " Buyers guide land-rover super .....etc." 

    Can't do links - sorry .

    I'll measure some of mine for you tomorrow 

    cheers

    Steve b

    Thanks Steve. I’ve got the 6.5” 1 ton rims here but I’m looking for a rim with around 60mm or less of inset. The ones I have here are nearly 100mm.

  5. 17 hours ago, smallfry said:

    I would always try to use an OE unit if you can cobble it in. From what I have seen, aftermarket/custom rads have hefty fins and tubes more suited to an intercooler IMO.

    I have got a Lexus LS400 one here, which produces far more HP than a Rover, and its only about 20mm thick.

    I don’t suppose you have the dimensions of the Lexus radiator do you?

    I was wondering if I could get a standard P38 rad recored to reduce the height. Width is fine🤔

  6. 1 hour ago, Bowie69 said:

    They are a very efficient modern radiator, so no need for any greater depth.

    You simply can't compare to say, a series radiator.

    Reason I ask is that I’ve been speaking to a well known ally radiator specialist who are adamant than nothing under a 50mm core will cool a V8 sufficiently. But then I saw that diagram which clearly states 40mm 🤷‍♂️
     

    A 40mm core would be ideal for my project so if this is correct then it gives me more ideas to work on 👍

    I’d also be interested in the height and width of the header tanks if anyone just happens to be walking past a P38 Thor rad with a tape measure in their hand....😉
     

    If anybody can also tell me the thread size of the gearbox oil cooler hose fittings that would also be appreciated. 

  7. 1 hour ago, western said:

    image.png.f38a31577031adf574e00360cca1d8cd.png

    Not a very good diagram as it does not show the lower end of the transfer lever

    🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Sorry Western, it didn’t, it’s an earlier box not the later one. The engine is later.

     I think I’m suffering from project fatigue, ignore me 😞

    • Confused 1
  8. 29 minutes ago, Gazzar said:

    I've a nice snorkel version of the oil bath for this. If I need extra  air flow I'll run it with a low oil level, but as the throw body is only 45mm at is narrowest, the oil bath can't be the restriction, or can it?

    I’ve read previously that the oil bath filter is very efficient so I don’t think there would be any problems running that 2.5. If you supercharged it then maybe but as it is at the moment, I wouldn’t worry.

    This is the elbow I was talking about.

    ADC09699-6D81-46F1-BAB7-00EEBACFBA86.jpeg.c299ec7f01909713323f3d94e5778e5b.jpeg

  9. Sorted.

    Removed the spring. Hammered off the old cup and then stuck the new one in some boiling water for a few minutes to soften it up.

    Found a suitable ring spanner to hold the cup in position and then gave the spanner a couple of blows with the hammer at which point the cup slipped back over the pivot ball.

    5DC8A950-F948-4763-907B-A525B8D2E4EC.jpeg.a97450fad8db53422f3ec06cce8bbffa.jpeg
     

    9ABD126A-BB5C-44D0-BB38-E8D2B42FEBD2.jpeg.a825afd44cd7feb1621017cc8916916a.jpeg

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website you agree to our Cookie Policy