Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TD5toV8110 said:

Agree. Older probably better for what you're doing.

Complete cars can be had for $5-6k (300000+kms...)

Then sell off body parts/wheels etc.

 

 

I’ve seen a x3 with 215k for $4500 but I’m pretty sure it’s Alloy and Piezo injectors. Still have to do more reading research to figure out if it’s actually a problem. I would like less km than 300k hopefully around 200k 

I’m also looking into the manual gearbox which I’ll probably have to import..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
13 hours ago, TD5toV8110 said:

What about a few 50mm ish holes to get some more weld surface area?

 

And look cool!

 

Yes there will be some added holes of some shape to the centreline of rail extension for added welding 👍

lots of other little details to add as well 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The buyer of my HS 2.8 Tgv came over yesterday and the engine is gone 👍

I did a little cleaning up of the engine bay and cut off the mounts. They weren’t factory and were pretty average…. As can be seen by the little surprise I found 🤦🏻‍♂️.

 

F58AECA8-06FC-4530-9EDA-98017A3228BD.thumb.jpeg.f40e7f615f559905599aec706c0fe4ca.jpeg

 

peek-a-boo…. 🙄

EDF956E7-9210-412A-8C80-3B5E3782D668.thumb.jpeg.7ca1ddfe6426771c5e927abaf8f88178.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2022 at 7:18 AM, uninformed said:

Nothing to add other than I’m starting to think (a little more seriously) about a M57N swap… I just don’t like the HS or 300Tdi ,

 

What's wrong with the 300, or, even better, the HS you had already?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Michele said:

What's wrong with the 300, or, even better, the HS you had already?

My experiences with both are negative. And that’s with going above and beyond regarding service and care. The HS has at least a head gasket failure. I’m done with them…. On to better things hopefully 🤞🤞

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started to work on the left side chassis rail extensions, setting the rear crossmember parallel to the front bulkhead (which is bolted with equal spacers each side), but then remembered hmmmm yeah Land Rover….

So I pulled out the old digital string line and set it to the centreline of chassis rails, it also has a built in 90 degree dot each side of line. Well surprise surprise, setting up the rear crossmember square to the chassis has it 7mm out of parallel to the front bulkhead. 
 

Also interesting is the fact all the factory suspension mounts (and in turn my new ones) were close to parallel to the front bulkhead 🤦🏻‍♂️
 

As I can only get a centreline point at mid chassis (just behind the LT230) I think I’ll pull the rest off and get a clear shot at the front of chassis. The Transmission has to come out anyway (R380 is getting sold and the LT230 is getting an ATB) 
 

At this point if nothing changes re relation to the full length of chassis, I’ll set everything square, and add a 4mm washer to one trailing arm and it’s opposite side radius arm. 
 

5E1F6C4D-8BB4-4463-8426-E94DB48E74A0.thumb.jpeg.c64a563ac3b4a48d283267e4cd0f4669.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Finally back to some fabrication and the rear crossmember. Chassis rail extensions done….well only the webs 😆. 200mm shorter than factory. Still LOTS to do just in the rear crossmember alone (more crush tubes to machine, another laser cutting and overlay to design and to sort)….

693F5143-B52F-435E-995A-15B38175A85F.thumb.jpeg.3c38b5f6c5baff7ce060d50ccafd0955.jpeg
 

5DE59E3B-E814-4D4C-926C-8E32BB00E001.thumb.jpeg.5dccdfbd557e18463505fa75fddb3285.jpeg

 

0AC86410-829A-40EB-AF54-43071E97B536.thumb.jpeg.77eec8998ae45a2a8b7d50c2e3fbd88c.jpeg

 

01DB6ED4-C850-49D2-89C8-5B98D6EED5C8.thumb.jpeg.03c23aa7769b145575f2d05820c2191e.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it seems nothing on a LR is ever really “done”…

After a run and paddle this morning I realised I had not cut the holes in webs for extra weld area. 4 webs, 16 holes, some die grinding and half a day later… at least that’s done 😆


A05BB2F5-F525-49D1-844F-10CA2F847130.thumb.jpeg.0624ff36dd5cd4a326e9caebd02e1808.jpeg

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Been hectic with work, rotting decks and running around. But I did manage to throw the wheels on and start damper mounting trials. Checking motion ratio and if the mounting had digressive, linear or progressive dampening.


25C725C3-9087-4A21-B45F-E93BAA895697.thumb.jpeg.6f2ae7d4ce6278eb44aa0319fbd1bd4c.jpeg

 

C7469F52-29D3-42C7-8783-6EF544957393.thumb.jpeg.cb4c72492ac40079422d95fa62582cc0.jpeg

 

D0ACDF15-0BCB-41D6-A571-7B921DF714C5.thumb.jpeg.c2ac70eae0ec60ed8e6ca51d62de4f85.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TD5toV8110 said:

Why mount the shocks to the arm rather than the housing?

Never seen that before...

A lot of American rock bouncers are like that, can aid in giving slightly more shock travel

Would have thought mounting point bracket would be slightly longer to spread load though regards Stephen

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer the above. For me the reason is packaging. Yes it is common to mount the dampers and coil overs on the LCAs (sometimes it’s the UCAs that are outboard) in desert and Ultra 4 racing. This came about because of the desired amount of wheel travel and speeds they race at. A shock at the housing would be CRAZY long and the shaft speeds would be insane! They overcome the reduction in dampening by going to BIG dampers. 3-4” dia pistons, in full bypass and usually a coil over and a bypass damper. 
 

You can just see there is a housing mount just inboard of the LCA and that’s where I had intended to mount the damper but it won’t be great geometry there and the wheel rate even higher. I am going to double check though by cycling it with one there. I can’t mount further out as there is more stuff going on that will become apparent later.

And that LCA damper mount was just whipped up to check damper geometry it’s only temporary hence the hose clamps. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I’ve Been a bit all over the show. I mocked up a trial damper mount. Just waiting on parts to convert my Bilstein 9100s from 46mm pistons to 60mm so I can finalise the dimensions. I’ve been cutting and shaping chassis doubler plates for various parts and started making the new rear bulkhead to chassis outrigger mounts (unfortunately factory mounts won’t work)

 

One thing that has been extremely frustrating is trying to buy parts, specifically high end or less common bits.  These are available but trying to get information or quotes is like getting blood from a stone, and I’m not talking cheap items either. 
 

anyway, just slowly chipping away…

 

 

DF9E00DC-CEE7-4DC6-8AAA-C794919C538A.jpeg

 

34451F81-59F0-4E17-87B2-DDCD11F11EEF.jpeg

F1D1FA41-A37A-4BCD-9B37-0E46061A09CF.jpeg

 

Edited by uninformed
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience. By using our website you agree to our Cookie Policy