Exactly. It doesn't need to be full of dem anglez like the Japanese stuff.
I tried a configuration, €144k https://build.landrover/A2EE5063 And that's without being able to select the PHEV option, so probably closer to €160k if Harry is to be believed...
Does look rather smart in green though:
Maybe in a few years when they're selling second-hand for €30k...
https://www.pistonheads.com/news/rangerover/2022-audi-rs3-sportback-ph-review/44848
Not sure why the link text is about an Audi, but the article is definitely about the Range Rover.
Still not a fan of the back, tye rest looks nice. PHEV and BEV options with low emissions, which is nice tax-wise. But only 2500kg towing for the PHEV... pretty sad.
I doubt it. I did the research in here a few pages back, even with the slight extra mass for the batteries it doesn't come close to max train weight with a 3.5T trailer. And I very much doubt those 250kg are going to make the difference to brakes and such considering a Series is allowed to tow 3.5T as well. At that weight the braking comes from the trailer anyway.
I don't really get how this applies to the Defender PHEV. The difference between 3000kg and 3500kg isn't going to make the battery last all that much longer. Advertise that the vehicle is capable of towing, but with the caveat that it can only do it with the engine on, and nobody would care.
Yes, the PHEV is the logical way to go. If only they'd managed to get a proper economical tune in it, so it'd be below 50g CO² here. That's a dealbreaker for taxes.
And the 3T towing I still find silly too. It's not train weight related, so... the motor can't handle it? What?
If it weren't for this thread I wouldn't have known about it until I was queuing for a petrol station in the UK, so I'm quite happy it was discussed
In the end managed (by accident) to find a calm fuel station just outside Exeter where I popped in £30 making it a comfortable trip instead of actually using start/stop and not driving in sport mode all the time